PL 165.50 · Article 165

Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in the Third Degree

This offense requires knowing possession of stolen property worth more than $3,000, together with a specified intent. That intent may be to benefit the person accused, benefit someone other than an owner, or impede an owner's recovery.

24 Years Experience · Since 2002Former ADAAvailable 24/7Se Habla Español

Has your loved one been arrested or taken into police custody?

Text us immediately · (845) 290-2492

Definition under New York law

PL 165.50 · Original statutory wording; excerpts must be read together with the full section.

§ 165.50 Criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree.A person is guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in thethird degree when he knowingly possesses stolen property, with intent tobenefit himself or a person other than an owner thereof or to impede therecovery by an owner thereof, and when the value of the property exceedsthree thousand dollars.Criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree is a classD felony.
Read the full section at the New York State Senate

In everyday language

This offense requires knowing possession of stolen property worth more than $3,000, together with a specified intent. That intent may be to benefit the person accused, benefit someone other than an owner, or impede an owner's recovery.

At a criminal trial, the prosecutor must prove every element of the charged subsection and that you committed the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. An accusation is not proof of guilt. Where the statute provides alternatives, the prosecutor need not prove every alternative; the charged theory matters. Affirmative defenses may have different proof rules.

CPL § 70.20

What the prosecutor must prove

  • The prosecutor must prove each required element beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • The person accused knowingly possessed stolen property and knew it was stolen.
  • The person accused intended to benefit themselves, benefit someone other than an owner, or impede an owner's recovery. These are alternatives, not cumulative requirements.
  • The property's value exceeded $3,000; exactly $3,000 does not meet this threshold.

Defenses that commonly apply

  • What evidence establishes that the person accused possessed the property and knew it was stolen?
  • What facts support or contradict an intent to benefit the person accused or another nonowner, or impede an owner's recovery?
  • What valuation evidence establishes a value greater than $3,000?

Penalties and collateral consequences

A Class D Felony carries a maximum sentence of up to 7 years and a fine of up to $5,000.

Common questions about your defense

Can disputing the $3,000 value threshold help challenge this charge?

If the evidence does not establish a value above $3,000, the value element of this offense may be challenged. A value of exactly $3,000 is insufficient under this statute. The prosecutor must prove value, knowing possession of stolen property, and one of the alternative intents beyond a reasonable doubt.

Why is starting a defense early imperative?

An early defense is imperative to protect your rights and preserve evidence that may disappear. Keep court papers, messages, footage, and witness information without deleting or altering anything. Counsel can review court dates and applicable deadlines, request evidence, and begin preparing your defense immediately.

How does an experienced lawyer help build the best possible defense?

Your lawyer checks the exact subsection, compares its requirements with the evidence, and listens to your account. Depending on the charge, counsel may investigate identification, intent, witness reliability, and possible problems with searches, statements, or testing. Working together on an early strategy is imperative to pursue the best possible outcome in your circumstances; no outcome is guaranteed.

Does an arrest or police report prove the charge?

No. A police report is part of the case, not a finding of guilt. Your lawyer can compare its claims with video, records, and witnesses and assess whether admissible evidence meets each applicable requirement.

Can the charge be dismissed or reduced?

That depends on the evidence, the charged subsection, and procedural rules. Challenging evidence, filing motions, negotiating a legally available resolution, or preparing for trial may be appropriate. No lawyer can promise dismissal, reduction, or acquittal.

Every case turns on its own facts. The information on this page is general, not legal advice.

Related charges

Related practice areas

Text us for immediate helpCall now