PL 240.30 · Article 240

Aggravated Harassment in the Second Degree

This statute provides several alternative routes involving threatening communications, purposeless harassing or threatening calls, specified bias-based contact or attempts or threats, contact with covered transit workers on assigned duty, contact causing physical injury, or first-degree harassment with a qualifying prior conviction. Each route has its own requirements, and the prosecutor must prove the applicable route beyond a reasonable doubt rather than combine requirements from unrelated alternatives.

24 Years Experience · Since 2002Former ADAAvailable 24/7Se Habla Español

Has your loved one been arrested or taken into police custody?

Text us immediately · (845) 290-2492

Definition under New York law

PL 240.30 · Original statutory wording; excerpts must be read together with the full section.

§ 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree. A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when: 1. With intent to harass another person, the actor either: (a) communicates, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, by computer or any other electronic means, or by mail, or by transmitting or delivering any other form of communication, a threat to cause physical harm to, or unlawful harm to the property of, such person, or a member of such person's same family or household as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of the criminal procedure law, and the actor knows or reasonably should know that such communication will cause such person to reasonably fear harm to such person's physical safety or property, or to the physical safety or property of a member of such person's same family or household; or (b) causes a communication to be initiated anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, by computer or any other electronic means, or by mail, or by transmitting or delivering any other form of communication, a threat to cause physical harm to, or unlawful harm to the property of, such person, a member of such person's same family or household as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of the criminal procedure law, and the actor knows or reasonably should know that such communication will cause such person to reasonably fear harm to such person's physical safety or property, or to the physical safety or property of a member of such person's same family or household; or 2. With intent to harass or threaten another person, he or she makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of legitimate communication; or 3. With the intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, including removing a religious clothing article or headdress from such person, or attempts or threatens to do the same because of a belief or perception regarding such person's race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation, regardless of whether the belief or perception is correct; or 3-a. With the intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, such person strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, which includes spitting on such other person, and such other person is a train operator, ticket inspector, conductor, signalperson, bus operator, station agent, station cleaner, terminal cleaner, station customer assistant, traffic checker; person whose official duties include the sale or collection of tickets, passes, vouchers, or other revenue payment media for use on a train, bus, or ferry or the collection or handling of revenues therefrom; a person whose official duties include the maintenance, repair, inspection, troubleshooting, testing or cleaning of buses or ferries, a transit signal system, elevated or underground subway tracks, transit station structure, including fare equipment, escalators, elevators and other equipment necessary to passenger service, commuter rail tracks or stations, train yard, revenue train in passenger service, a ferry station, or a train or bus station or terminal; or a supervisor of such personnel, employed by any transit agency, authority or company, public or private, whose operation is authorized by New York state or any of its political subdivisions while such individual is performing an assigned duty; or 4. With the intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact thereby causing physical injury to such person or to a family or household member of such person as defined in section 530.11 of the criminal procedure law; or 5. He or she commits the crime of harassment in the first degree and has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment in the first degree as defined by section 240.25 of this article within the preceding ten years. Aggravated harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.
Read the full section at the New York State Senate

In everyday language

This statute provides several alternative routes involving threatening communications, purposeless harassing or threatening calls, specified bias-based contact or attempts or threats, contact with covered transit workers on assigned duty, contact causing physical injury, or first-degree harassment with a qualifying prior conviction. Each route has its own requirements, and the prosecutor must prove the applicable route beyond a reasonable doubt rather than combine requirements from unrelated alternatives.

At a criminal trial, the prosecutor must prove every element of the charged subsection and that you committed the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. An accusation is not proof of guilt. Where the statute provides alternatives, the prosecutor need not prove every alternative; the charged theory matters. Affirmative defenses may have different proof rules.

CPL § 70.20

What the prosecutor must prove

  • The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt all requirements of at least one statutory route below. These routes, including 1(a) and 1(b), are alternatives, not cumulative requirements.
  • Alternative 1(a): with intent to harass another person, the person accused communicates a threat of physical harm or unlawful property harm directed at that person or a member of the same family or household as defined in CPL 530.11(1). The communication may be anonymous or identified and made by telephone, computer, any other electronic means, mail, or transmission or delivery of any other form of communication.
  • Alternative 1(b): with the same intent to harass, the person accused causes such a threatening communication to be initiated, through any of the same means and whether anonymous or not. For either 1(a) or 1(b), the person accused must know or reasonably should know that the communication will cause the other person reasonably to fear harm to their own physical safety or property, or the physical safety or property of a member of the same family or household.
  • Alternative 2: with intent to harass or threaten another person, the person accused makes a telephone call with no purpose of legitimate communication, whether or not a conversation occurs.
  • Alternative 3: with intent to harass, annoy, threaten, or alarm another person, the person accused strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, including removing religious clothing or a headdress, or attempts or threatens to do so. This must be because of a belief or perception about that person's race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability, or sexual orientation, whether or not that belief or perception is correct.
  • Alternative 3-a: with intent to harass, annoy, threaten, or alarm another person, the person accused strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, including spitting on that person. The other person must be a covered transit worker performing an assigned duty, employed by a public or private transit agency, authority, or company authorized to operate by New York State or one of its political subdivisions.
  • Covered workers under 3-a are train operators, ticket inspectors, conductors, signalpersons, bus operators, station agents, station cleaners, terminal cleaners, station customer assistants, traffic checkers; workers whose official duties include selling or collecting tickets, passes, vouchers, or other payment media for trains, buses, or ferries, or collecting or handling those revenues; workers whose official duties include maintenance, repair, inspection, troubleshooting, testing, or cleaning of buses or ferries, transit signal systems, elevated or underground subway tracks, transit station structures including fare equipment, escalators, elevators, and other equipment necessary to passenger service, commuter rail tracks or stations, train yards, revenue trains in passenger service, ferry stations, or train or bus stations or terminals; and supervisors of such personnel.
  • Alternative 4: with intent to harass, annoy, threaten, or alarm another person, the person accused strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact and thereby causes physical injury to that person or a family or household member of that person as defined in CPL 530.11.
  • Alternative 5: the person accused commits first-degree harassment and has a prior conviction for first-degree harassment as defined in PL 240.25 within the preceding ten years. The incorporated current offense requires intentional and repeated harassment through public following, a course of conduct, or repeated acts placing the other person in reasonable fear of physical injury, and excludes the federally regulated labor activities specified in that section.

Defenses that commonly apply

  • Which route is alleged, and what evidence establishes its required intent and, for threatening communications, the required knowledge or reasonable foreseeability of fear, or for telephone calls, the absence of a legitimate communication purpose?
  • For a contact-based route, what evidence establishes the required contact, attempt, or threat and the applicable additional fact: specified bias motivation, covered transit employment and assigned duty, or resulting physical injury to a qualifying person?
  • For the prior-conviction route, do the facts establish current first-degree harassment, including its fear requirement and labor-activity exclusion, and do records establish a qualifying conviction of the person accused within the preceding ten years?

Penalties and collateral consequences

A Class A Misdemeanor carries a maximum sentence of up to 364 days and a fine of up to $1,000.

Common questions about your defense

Does the absence of physical injury defeat second-degree aggravated harassment?

Physical injury is expressly required by alternative 4, but it is not a requirement shared by all the statute's alternative routes. If the charge relies on alternative 4, a lack of proof of injury or its causal connection to the contact could support a challenge; another route would require proof of its own distinct facts. The prosecutor must prove every element of the applicable route beyond a reasonable doubt.

Why is starting a defense early imperative?

An early defense is imperative to protect your rights and preserve evidence that may disappear. Keep court papers, messages, footage, and witness information without deleting or altering anything. Counsel can review court dates and applicable deadlines, request evidence, and begin preparing your defense immediately.

How does an experienced lawyer help build the best possible defense?

Your lawyer checks the exact subsection, compares its requirements with the evidence, and listens to your account. Depending on the charge, counsel may investigate identification, intent, witness reliability, and possible problems with searches, statements, or testing. Working together on an early strategy is imperative to pursue the best possible outcome in your circumstances; no outcome is guaranteed.

Does an arrest or police report prove the charge?

No. A police report is part of the case, not a finding of guilt. Your lawyer can compare its claims with video, records, and witnesses and assess whether admissible evidence meets each applicable requirement.

Can the charge be dismissed or reduced?

That depends on the evidence, the charged subsection, and procedural rules. Challenging evidence, filing motions, negotiating a legally available resolution, or preparing for trial may be appropriate. No lawyer can promise dismissal, reduction, or acquittal.

Every case turns on its own facts. The information on this page is general, not legal advice.

Related charges

Related practice areas

Text us for immediate helpCall now