PL 215.15 · Article 215

Intimidating a Victim or Witness in the Third Degree

This offense requires knowledge that another person has information about a criminal transaction and conduct outside that transaction or its immediate flight. It alternatively covers coercion or attempted coercion through fear of physical injury, or intentional property damage to prevent or retaliate for specified communications.

24 Years Experience · Since 2002Former ADAAvailable 24/7Se Habla Español

Has your loved one been arrested or taken into police custody?

Text us immediately · (845) 290-2492

Definition under New York law

PL 215.15 · Original statutory wording; excerpts must be read together with the full section.

§ 215.15 Intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree.A person is guilty of intimidating a victim or witness in the thirddegree when, knowing that another person possesses information relatingto a criminal transaction and other than in the course of that criminaltransaction or immediate flight therefrom, he:1. Wrongfully compels or attempts to compel such other person torefrain from communicating such information to any court, grand jury,prosecutor, police officer or peace officer by means of instilling inhim a fear that the actor will cause physical injury to such otherperson or another person; or2. Intentionally damages the property of such other person or anotherperson for the purpose of compelling such other person or another personto refrain from communicating, or on account of such other person oranother person having communicated, information relating to thatcriminal transaction to any court, grand jury, prosecutor, policeofficer or peace officer.Intimidating a victim or witness in the third degree is a class Efelony.
Read the full section at the New York State Senate

In everyday language

This offense requires knowledge that another person has information about a criminal transaction and conduct outside that transaction or its immediate flight. It alternatively covers coercion or attempted coercion through fear of physical injury, or intentional property damage to prevent or retaliate for specified communications.

At a criminal trial, the prosecutor must prove every element of the charged subsection and that you committed the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. An accusation is not proof of guilt. Where the statute provides alternatives, the prosecutor need not prove every alternative; the charged theory matters. Affirmative defenses may have different proof rules.

CPL § 70.20

What the prosecutor must prove

  • The person accused knew another person possessed information relating to a criminal transaction, and the alleged conduct occurred outside that transaction and its immediate flight.
  • The following two routes are alternatives, not cumulative requirements; the prosecution must prove all required elements of an applicable route beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Fear route: the person accused wrongfully compelled or attempted to compel that information holder not to communicate the information to a court, grand jury, prosecutor, police officer, or peace officer by instilling fear that the person accused would physically injure the information holder or another person. Actual injury is not required by this route.
  • Property route: the person accused intentionally damaged property belonging to the information holder or another person, either to compel the information holder or another person not to communicate information about that criminal transaction to one of the listed recipients, or because the information holder or another person had communicated it.

Defenses that commonly apply

  • What establishes knowledge that another person possessed information about a criminal transaction, and when did the alleged conduct occur relative to that transaction and immediate flight?
  • For the fear route, was there wrongful coercion or attempted coercion through fear that the person accused would cause physical injury to someone?
  • For the property route, was damage intentional and connected to preventing or retaliating for a communication to a listed recipient?

Penalties and collateral consequences

A Class E Felony carries a maximum sentence of up to 4 years and a fine of up to $5,000.

Common questions about your defense

Can the charge be challenged if property damage was unrelated to a witness's communication?

The property-damage alternative requires intentional damage aimed at preventing a specified communication or caused because such a communication occurred. If the damage lacked either connection, that would challenge this alternative, though the separate fear-based alternative must be evaluated if alleged. The prosecution must prove every required element of an applicable route beyond a reasonable doubt.

Why is starting a defense early imperative?

An early defense is imperative to protect your rights and preserve evidence that may disappear. Keep court papers, messages, footage, and witness information without deleting or altering anything. Counsel can review court dates and applicable deadlines, request evidence, and begin preparing your defense immediately.

How does an experienced lawyer help build the best possible defense?

Your lawyer checks the exact subsection, compares its requirements with the evidence, and listens to your account. Depending on the charge, counsel may investigate identification, intent, witness reliability, and possible problems with searches, statements, or testing. Working together on an early strategy is imperative to pursue the best possible outcome in your circumstances; no outcome is guaranteed.

Does an arrest or police report prove the charge?

No. A police report is part of the case, not a finding of guilt. Your lawyer can compare its claims with video, records, and witnesses and assess whether admissible evidence meets each applicable requirement.

Can the charge be dismissed or reduced?

That depends on the evidence, the charged subsection, and procedural rules. Challenging evidence, filing motions, negotiating a legally available resolution, or preparing for trial may be appropriate. No lawyer can promise dismissal, reduction, or acquittal.

Every case turns on its own facts. The information on this page is general, not legal advice.

Related charges

Related practice areas

Text us for immediate helpCall now