PL 125.12 · Article 125
Vehicular Manslaughter in the Second Degree
This statute covers a death caused through specified unlawful intoxicated or impaired operation of motor vehicles, vessels, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles, with a separate route for certain heavy vehicles carrying hazardous materials. It requires the specified connection between intoxication or impairment, operation, and death, and provides a rebuttable presumption when its stated triggering facts are established.
Has your loved one been arrested or taken into police custody?
Text us immediately · (845) 290-2492Definition under New York law
PL 125.12 · Original statutory wording; excerpts must be read together with the full section.
§ 125.12 Vehicular manslaughter in the second degree. A person is guilty of vehicular manslaughter in the second degree when he or she causes the death of another person, and either: (1) operates a motor vehicle in violation of subdivision two, three, four or four-a of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law or operates a vessel or public vessel in violation of paragraph (b), (c), (d) or (e) of subdivision two of section forty-nine-a of the navigation law, and as a result of such intoxication or impairment by the use of a drug, or by the combined influence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, operates such motor vehicle, vessel or public vessel in a manner that causes the death of such other person, or (2) operates a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than eighteen thousand pounds which contains flammable gas, radioactive materials or explosives in violation of subdivision one of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, and such flammable gas, radioactive materials or explosives is the cause of such death, and as a result of such impairment by the use of alcohol, operates such motor vehicle in a manner that causes the death of such other person, or (3) operates a snowmobile in violation of paragraph (b), (c) or (d) of subdivision one of section 25.24 of the parks, recreation and historic preservation law or operates an all terrain vehicle as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section twenty-two hundred eighty-one of the vehicle and traffic law in violation of subdivision two, three, four, or four-a of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, and as a result of such intoxication or impairment by the use of a drug, or by the combined influence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, operates such snowmobile or all terrain vehicle in a manner that causes the death of such other person. If it is established that the person operating such motor vehicle, vessel, public vessel, snowmobile or all terrain vehicle caused such death while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by the use of alcohol or a drug, then there shall be a rebuttable presumption that, as a result of such intoxication or impairment by the use of alcohol or a drug, or by the combined influence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, such person operated the motor vehicle, vessel, public vessel, snowmobile or all terrain vehicle in a manner that caused such death, as required by this section. Vehicular manslaughter in the second degree is a class D felony.Read the full section at the New York State SenateIn everyday language
This statute covers a death caused through specified unlawful intoxicated or impaired operation of motor vehicles, vessels, snowmobiles, or all-terrain vehicles, with a separate route for certain heavy vehicles carrying hazardous materials. It requires the specified connection between intoxication or impairment, operation, and death, and provides a rebuttable presumption when its stated triggering facts are established.
At a criminal trial, the prosecutor must prove every element of the charged subsection and that you committed the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. An accusation is not proof of guilt. Where the statute provides alternatives, the prosecutor need not prove every alternative; the charged theory matters. Affirmative defenses may have different proof rules.
CPL § 70.20What the prosecutor must prove
- The prosecution must prove the applicable criminal-offense requirements beyond a reasonable doubt. The three statutory routes are alternatives, not cumulative requirements, and each requires that the person accused caused another person's death.
- Alternative 1: The person accused operated a motor vehicle in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law section 1192(2), (3), (4), or (4-a), or a vessel or public vessel in violation of Navigation Law section 49-a(2)(b), (c), (d), or (e). As a result of the specified intoxication or impairment by a drug, combined drugs, or alcohol combined with drugs, the person accused operated it in a manner causing the other person's death.
- Alternative 2: The person accused operated a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 18,000 pounds, containing flammable gas, radioactive materials, or explosives, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law section 1192(1). The hazardous material caused the death, and alcohol impairment resulted in operation of the vehicle in a manner causing that death; these requirements within alternative 2 are cumulative.
- Alternative 3: The person accused operated a snowmobile in violation of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law section 25.24(1)(b), (c), or (d), or an all-terrain vehicle as defined in Vehicle and Traffic Law section 2281(1)(a) in violation of section 1192(2), (3), (4), or (4-a). As a result of the specified intoxication or impairment by a drug, combined drugs, or alcohol combined with drugs, the person accused operated it in a manner causing the other person's death.
- If it is established that the operator caused the death while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by alcohol or a drug, the statute creates a rebuttable presumption that the intoxication or impairment, including the stated combined influences, resulted in operation causing the death. The presumption is rebuttable, not conclusive, and does not replace the prosecution's criminal burden of proof.
Defenses that commonly apply
- What evidence establishes that the person accused operated the vehicle or vessel and violated one of the provisions specified for that type of vehicle or vessel?
- What crash, medical, or toxicology evidence supports or undermines the required causal connection between intoxication or impairment, operation, and death, including any facts that could rebut the statutory presumption?
- If the heavy-vehicle alternative is alleged, what records establish the gross vehicle weight rating, the specified hazardous cargo, and that cargo's role in causing the death?
Penalties and collateral consequences
A Class D Felony carries a maximum sentence of up to 7 years in state prison and a fine of up to $5,000 or up to twice the gain.
These cases also carry license revocation consequences under the Vehicle and Traffic Law.
Common questions about your defense
Can causation be contested despite the vehicular-manslaughter presumption?
The presumption arises if it is established that the operator caused the death while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by alcohol or a drug. Because it is rebuttable, evidence undermining the asserted link between intoxication or impairment and the death-causing operation may support a defense, and the triggering facts may also be contested. The prosecution still must prove the applicable criminal-offense requirements beyond a reasonable doubt.
Why is starting a defense early imperative?
An early defense is imperative to protect your rights and preserve evidence that may disappear. Keep court papers, messages, footage, and witness information without deleting or altering anything. Counsel can review court dates and applicable deadlines, request evidence, and begin preparing your defense immediately.
How does an experienced lawyer help build the best possible defense?
Your lawyer checks the exact subsection, compares its requirements with the evidence, and listens to your account. Depending on the charge, counsel may investigate identification, intent, witness reliability, and possible problems with searches, statements, or testing. Working together on an early strategy is imperative to pursue the best possible outcome in your circumstances; no outcome is guaranteed.
Does an arrest or police report prove the charge?
No. A police report is part of the case, not a finding of guilt. Your lawyer can compare its claims with video, records, and witnesses and assess whether admissible evidence meets each applicable requirement.
Can the charge be dismissed or reduced?
That depends on the evidence, the charged subsection, and procedural rules. Challenging evidence, filing motions, negotiating a legally available resolution, or preparing for trial may be appropriate. No lawyer can promise dismissal, reduction, or acquittal.
Every case turns on its own facts. The information on this page is general, not legal advice.
Related charges
PL 125.10 · Class E Felony
PL 120.03 · Class E Felony
VTL 1192.3 · Misdemeanor
PL 125.25 · Class A-I Felony
PL 125.20 · Class B Felony
PL 125.15 · Class C Felony
Related practice areas
Aggressive, experienced defense for arrests, investigations, and serious charges in Rockland, Orange, and Westchester Counties.
From major felonies to misdemeanors and violations, a former prosecutor in your corner from arraignment to verdict.
Tickets, license suspensions, and DMV hearings — keep points off your record and your license in your pocket.
