PL 120.03 · Article 120
Vehicular Assault in the Second Degree
This offense requires serious physical injury and one of three alternative routes involving specified intoxication or impairment violations: a motor vehicle or vessel, a heavy vehicle carrying specified hazardous materials, or a snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle. Each route requires the specified causal connection between impairment, operation, and injury, and the statute provides a rebuttable presumption of that connection when its stated conditions are established.
Has your loved one been arrested or taken into police custody?
Text us immediately · (845) 290-2492Definition under New York law
PL 120.03 · Original statutory wording; excerpts must be read together with the full section.
§ 120.03 Vehicular assault in the second degree.A person is guilty of vehicular assault in the second degree when heor she causes serious physical injury to another person, and either:(1) operates a motor vehicle in violation of subdivision two, three,four or four-a of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle andtraffic law or operates a vessel or public vessel in violation ofparagraph (b), (c), (d) or (e) of subdivision two of sectionforty-nine-a of the navigation law, and as a result of such intoxicationor impairment by the use of a drug, or by the combined influence ofdrugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, operates such motor vehicle,vessel or public vessel in a manner that causes such serious physicalinjury to such other person, or(2) operates a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating ofmore than eighteen thousand pounds which contains flammable gas,radioactive materials or explosives in violation of subdivision one ofsection eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, andsuch flammable gas, radioactive materials or explosives is the cause ofsuch serious physical injury, and as a result of such impairment by theuse of alcohol, operates such motor vehicle in a manner that causes suchserious physical injury to such other person, or(3) operates a snowmobile in violation of paragraph (b), (c) or (d) ofsubdivision one of section 25.24 of the parks, recreation and historicpreservation law or operates an all terrain vehicle as defined inparagraph (a) of subdivision one of section twenty-two hundredeighty-one of the vehicle and traffic law and in violation ofsubdivision two, three, four, or four-a of section eleven hundredninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, and as a result of suchintoxication or impairment by the use of a drug, or by the combinedinfluence of drugs or of alcohol and any drug or drugs, operates suchsnowmobile or all terrain vehicle in a manner that causes such seriousphysical injury to such other person.If it is established that the person operating such motor vehicle,vessel, public vessel, snowmobile or all terrain vehicle caused suchserious physical injury while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by theuse of alcohol or a drug, then there shall be a rebuttable presumptionthat, as a result of such intoxication or impairment by the use ofalcohol or a drug, or by the combined influence of drugs or of alcoholand any drug or drugs, such person operated the motor vehicle, vessel,public vessel, snowmobile or all terrain vehicle in a manner that causedsuch serious physical injury, as required by this section.Vehicular assault in the second degree is a class E felony.Read the full section at the New York State SenateIn everyday language
This offense requires serious physical injury and one of three alternative routes involving specified intoxication or impairment violations: a motor vehicle or vessel, a heavy vehicle carrying specified hazardous materials, or a snowmobile or all-terrain vehicle. Each route requires the specified causal connection between impairment, operation, and injury, and the statute provides a rebuttable presumption of that connection when its stated conditions are established.
At a criminal trial, the prosecutor must prove every element of the charged subsection and that you committed the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. An accusation is not proof of guilt. Where the statute provides alternatives, the prosecutor need not prove every alternative; the charged theory matters. Affirmative defenses may have different proof rules.
CPL § 70.20What the prosecutor must prove
- The prosecutor must prove the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, including that the person accused caused serious physical injury to another person.
- The following three routes are alternatives, not cumulative requirements.
- Alternative 1: The person accused operated a motor vehicle in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(2), (3), (4), or (4-a), or a vessel or public vessel in violation of Navigation Law § 49-a(2)(b), (c), (d), or (e). As a result of the specified intoxication or impairment by a drug, combined drugs, or alcohol and drugs, the person accused operated it in a manner causing the serious physical injury.
- Alternative 2: The person accused operated a motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating over 18,000 pounds, containing flammable gas, radioactive materials, or explosives, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(1). Those materials caused the serious physical injury, and alcohol impairment caused the person accused to operate the vehicle in a manner causing that injury.
- Alternative 3: The person accused operated a snowmobile in violation of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Law § 25.24(1)(b), (c), or (d), or an all-terrain vehicle as defined in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 2281(1)(a), in violation of § 1192(2), (3), (4), or (4-a). As a result of the specified intoxication or impairment by a drug, combined drugs, or alcohol and drugs, the person accused operated it in a manner causing the serious physical injury.
- If it is established that the operator caused the serious physical injury while unlawfully intoxicated or impaired by alcohol or a drug, the statute creates a rebuttable presumption of the required impairment-related causal connection; that presumption is not conclusive.
Defenses that commonly apply
- What medical evidence establishes whether the injury was a serious physical injury?
- What evidence establishes the applicable operating violation and, for the hazardous-materials alternative, the vehicle's weight rating, contents, and those materials' role in causing injury?
- What reconstruction, witness, or other evidence bears on whether intoxication or impairment caused the injurious operation, including evidence that could rebut the statutory presumption?
Penalties and collateral consequences
A Class E Felony carries a maximum sentence of up to 4 years in state prison and a fine of up to $5,000 or up to twice the gain.
Common questions about your defense
Can the causal connection between impairment and injury be disputed?
The statute requires the specified intoxication or impairment to result in operation that causes serious physical injury. If the statutory conditions are established, a rebuttable presumption applies, but evidence of a different causal explanation may support a challenge to that connection. The prosecutor must still prove the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, and the effect of any rebuttal depends on the evidence.
Why is starting a defense early imperative?
An early defense is imperative to protect your rights and preserve evidence that may disappear. Keep court papers, messages, footage, and witness information without deleting or altering anything. Counsel can review court dates and applicable deadlines, request evidence, and begin preparing your defense immediately.
How does an experienced lawyer help build the best possible defense?
Your lawyer checks the exact subsection, compares its requirements with the evidence, and listens to your account. Depending on the charge, counsel may investigate identification, intent, witness reliability, and possible problems with searches, statements, or testing. Working together on an early strategy is imperative to pursue the best possible outcome in your circumstances; no outcome is guaranteed.
Does an arrest or police report prove the charge?
No. A police report is part of the case, not a finding of guilt. Your lawyer can compare its claims with video, records, and witnesses and assess whether admissible evidence meets each applicable requirement.
Can the charge be dismissed or reduced?
That depends on the evidence, the charged subsection, and procedural rules. Challenging evidence, filing motions, negotiating a legally available resolution, or preparing for trial may be appropriate. No lawyer can promise dismissal, reduction, or acquittal.
Every case turns on its own facts. The information on this page is general, not legal advice.
Related charges
PL 125.12 · Class D Felony
PL 130.25 · Class E Felony
VTL 1192.3 · Misdemeanor
PL 120.45 · Class B Misdemeanor
PL 120.50 · Class A Misdemeanor
PL 120.00 · Class A Misdemeanor
PL 120.05 · Class D Felony
PL 120.10 · Class B Felony
Related practice areas
Aggressive, experienced defense for arrests, investigations, and serious charges in Rockland, Orange, and Westchester Counties.
From major felonies to misdemeanors and violations, a former prosecutor in your corner from arraignment to verdict.
Tickets, license suspensions, and DMV hearings — keep points off your record and your license in your pocket.
